The U.S. Department of Homeland Security is directing immigration attorneys to dismiss asylum cases without hearings on the merits, preventing applicants from presenting evidence of persecution in court. This streamlined dismissal process, called pretermission, expanded dramatically under a September 2026 directive requiring ICE's legal advisors to file motions to dismiss asylum claims they deem legally insufficient.
According to reporting, the government filed 17,000 pretermit motions in January 2026—a 283-fold increase from 60 filed a year earlier. Immigration judges approved approximately 80 percent of these dismissals. DHS estimates the policy could ultimately affect 444,000 pending asylum cases, leaving hundreds of thousands of applicants unable to present their case to a judge.
Table of Contents
- How Pretermission Works
- Scale and Acceleration of Dismissals
- What Asylum Seekers Lose
- Deporting to Third Countries Instead of Adjudicating
- What Asylum Seekers Should Know
- Frequently Asked Questions
How Pretermission Works
Pretermission is a legal mechanism that allows an immigration judge to dismiss a case before the applicant testifies, based on finding the application legally insufficient on its face—meaning the written claim fails to meet basic legal requirements for asylum protection. According to the Immigration Policy Tracking Project, EOIR's Acting Director issued Policy Memorandum 25-28 in April 2025, authorizing immigration judges to use pretermission more broadly against asylum applications they determine lack sufficient legal ground.
The process bypasses the evidentiary hearing where applicants normally present evidence of persecution, threats, or other circumstances supporting their asylum claim. Instead, immigration judges evaluate the written application alone and decide whether it states a legally viable claim. If a judge agrees with ICE's motion to pretermit, the case is dismissed—sometimes orally, without the applicant or their attorney receiving advance notice.
- —
Scale and Acceleration of Dismissals
Pretermission motions have surged under the new DHS directive. Between May and July 2025, DHS filed 6,210 motions to pretermit, with immigration judges approving 80 percent of them. The acceleration continued into 2026, when the government filed 17,000 such motions in January alone—more than 280 times the 60 motions filed in January 2025. This trajectory suggests the september 2026 directive has further encouraged ICE attorneys to use pretermission as a default strategy. The government's own projections indicate the policy could affect approximately 444,000 pending asylum cases overall, and result in over 132,000 cases referred to immigration court annually without a merit hearing.
- —
What Asylum Seekers Lose
When a case is pretermitted, the applicant loses their opportunity to testify and present evidence in court—the only venue where they can directly make their case to a judge. An asylum seeker whose application is dismissed through pretermission may have no subsequent right to a hearing, leaving them without legal protection against deportation.
The consequences extend beyond the asylum decision itself. If an applicant's work permit is based on their pending asylum case, a dismissal eliminates the legal basis for employment authorization. Without a valid asylum case, applicants lose their ability to work legally while remaining in the United States. Refiling an asylum application with USCIS after a pretermit dismissal is possible but uncertain and does not guarantee protection.
- —
Deporting to Third Countries Instead of Adjudicating
Rather than allowing asylum consideration on the merits, the government is pursuing deportations to third countries that have agreed to accept non-citizens, including Guatemala, Honduras, Ecuador, and Uganda. These "safe third country" arrangements allow ICE to argue that applicants can be deported without ever having their asylum claim evaluated by a U.S. judge. This approach prioritizes expulsion speed over individual assessment of danger or persecution risk. An applicant pretermitted on legal sufficiency grounds and faced with deportation to a third country has no hearing to contest whether that destination country is actually safe or whether they face risk there.
- —
What Asylum Seekers Should Know
If you have a pending asylum case or are considering filing one, understand that pretermission motions can now be filed at any stage. An immigration judge may dismiss your case based solely on your written application, without a hearing, if ICE argues it lacks legal sufficiency. This means the written details in your asylum application are critical—vague or incomplete descriptions of persecution may give immigration judges grounds to pretermit without ever hearing your testimony.
If your case is dismissed through pretermission, consult an immigration attorney immediately. You may have limited options to challenge the dismissal, and timing matters for any appeal or refiling decision. Do not assume that a dismissal is final without legal advice specific to your situation.
- —
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I appeal a pretermit dismissal?
Appeal options depend on your case and jurisdiction. An immigration attorney can assess whether you have grounds to challenge the dismissal or pursue other remedies. Do not delay—timing is critical.
If my case is dismissed, can I reapply for asylum?
You may be able to file a new asylum application with USCIS, but this does not guarantee approval. Consult an attorney about your specific situation before refiling.
What makes an asylum application "legally insufficient"?
The phrase generally refers to applications that fail to meet basic legal requirements for asylum on paper—such as missing essential information, arriving too late, or failing to establish persecution by a government or group the law recognizes. Immigration judges decide this, sometimes without a hearing. —